Email Strategy Roundtable: Ben & Jerry's Kills Email
The UK operations of Ben & Jerry’s caused a huge stir recently when they decided to end their monthly newsletter and move their communications to Facebook and Twitter. Not to worry, American ice cream lovers – the US email marketing train for Ben & Jerry’s is still going strong. But why did the Brits shut it down? Simms Jenkins of ClickZ spoke with the Ben & Jerry’s team and learned that they had polled their customers on where they wanted to interact with the brand, and social media won out over their inboxes. Read the full story here. Was this is a dangerous decision, or a wickedly smart one? Our strategists weigh in:
Kristen: I wouldn't advise killing a marketing channel without thorough analysis. You could have a loud minority shouting their preferences that don't represent everyone. You may be able to find more cost-effective ways to continue to market via channels that aren't seeing the ROI you'd like. You should probably test channel changes, keeping a control group, before making any sweeping decisions.
Kimberly: I think if I had the opportunity to speak to Sean directly I would have asked him “why not continue the UK newsletter to those individuals who still want to receive it. When asking for your subscribers’ preferences did you give them the option to continue receiving this newsletter? If not why? What was the underlying business reason?
I agree wholly with Simms that “the digital savvy should plan how to combine the two for the most powerful digital communication platter that a marketer could ask for”. By taking away either email or social channels you cut your brand short of the opportunity to bring your brand to life. Orchestrating both of these channels to provide unique content and value for your brand advocates requires strategy and a thoughtful approach – which ultimately is the secret sauce each marketer should strive to create.
Julie: While I am stunned at the bold move from Ben & Jerry’s UK, I’m impressed by their nerve. I would love to know the numbers behind this decision, and what their plan is to fully optimize their Facebook and Twitter marketing efforts. My concern is that their goodbye message mentioned “we’ll still send you the odd email on special occasions.” What does that mean, what kind of content would they be sending, and what constitutes a special occasion… and how often do those occur? Not setting proper expectations could be dangerous, and not sending frequently enough could be damaging to their deliverability, spam complaints, and engagement. I wonder how the metrics on these future one-off emails will compare to their old newsletter. Hopefully, since they’ve been so transparent about their email marketing, they’ll be willing to share this in a future blog post!
What do you think of this daring business decision, and have you had any experience with shutting down a marketing channel? Please share in the comments below.
Julie Waite
Email Marketing Strategist at Bronto




Thanks for the shout out and
Thanks for the shout out and good conversation here. I agree with all points here - my biggest takeaway: yes they asked their customers what they wanted but you should never turn back on any customer after they expressed their preference by providing permission. That would alienate me and maybe make me think about a Baskin Robbins trip rather than my usual B & J fix.
I agree with Simms that if
I agree with Simms that if they gave you permission to email them then turning your back on that is not the best move. If I tell you to have a salesman call me, don't send one to knock on my front door;).
What blew me away about the whole thing was that no one bothered to check with Ben & Jerry's about the issue till we contacted them and broke the story that is was only the UK operation focusing more on social. Everyone had their own agenda and the truth got lost in the swirl.
http://www.theemailguide.com/email-marketing/scoop-ben-jerry%e2%80%99s-r...
Regards,
jim
I think if the majority of
I think if the majority of their subscribers didn't want to get email and they could divert $$ or pounds this case to another channel where they would have better reception, then I say do it. However, I have to believe that there were some people who still wanted to get email. What would have been a better move would be to keep the program open, but ONLY and I mean ONLY send to those folks who really want to get email.
Agreed, Andrew... and what
Agreed, Andrew... and what about those subscribers who didn't open or didn't respond to whatever survey Ben & Jerry's sent out? Was the decision just made for them?
Every company can and should
Every company can and should decide what is best for them in terms of their marketing campaigns. What did not make sense is that Ben & Jerry wanted to close one of the industries best performing (email marketing) programs and move it all to social networking which by any means is still new and to a certain extent unproven in terms of conversions.
Instead of just closing their email marketing program what Ben & Jerry should have done is run both marketing programs at the same time and slowly over time see as well as allocate more resources to the marketing program that converts better for them.
Ben & Jerry's should not have
Ben & Jerry's should not have shut down the email marketing program in it's entirety, you never want to put all your eggs in once basket. Running both programs simultaneously for a while is a better idea. Let's see how it pans out for them.
Post new comment